I would say the learning objective I felt that we most
focused on throughout this class is the aspect of critical thinking: “Students
will become more conscious of their processes for planning, drafting, revising,
and editing of writing. Students will take an active role in summarizing,
synthesizing, and presenting course content.” In this course, I have been
confronted with figuring out how I will conduct a classroom, what teaching
philosophies I will adhere to (which, I am sorry to say, I had never considered
thoroughly before). Not only have I examined my own methods of writing, but
also I have been able to examine other possible methods that need to be made
available to my future students.
We have worked through theories on various methods of
writing through our readings on revision/processes of writing and the
hypermediated syllabus assignment. I had never come into contact with any of
the assigned readings from this class. This is most likely because the classes
I took at my undergrad did not have a focus on rhetoric specifically, and I had
never before taken an interest in composition. (Even if I had, I’m fairly sure
they teach FYC through literature at HSU). I thought that these readings
provided necessary and needed insight to my future teaching career, as I had
never taken a class that focuses primarily on the discussion of pedagogy/andragogy.
These theories we have gone over have fascinating implications for the
classroom and what it means to be teaching students from all different
backgrounds. I appreciate that names were given to the phenomenons of “guarding
the tower” and “converting the natives,” explaining that all new English
teachers will tend to experience these forms of miscommunication with students
that they are trying so desperately to impact.
The largest and most important assignment that this class
had to offer for me was the hypermediated syllabus. Never before have I been
confronted with building my own class, and I was intimidated by it. Even after
simmering in all these readings the whole semester, I still remain unsure of
the theories behind my choices and whether or not I will continue to think of
them as viable ways of teaching—especially since I have yet to teach my own
class. Nevertheless, I think it was a valuable experience to be required to
think over these ideas and have to momentarily commit to a method of teaching.
This syllabus assignment only touched on the decisions I will eventually have
to make. While writing it, I know that I played it safe in certain areas where
I might not in the future, and I committed to assignments that I have seen work
in other classes while avoiding creating my own. I am not quite sure that I
brought the “funk,” as Dr. Rice requested, but perhaps with more practice I can
step it up.
These experiences will obviously influence my future career
as a professor. There is one thing that I wish I had paired with this class
this semester—I wish I had taken the initiative to shadow a CI in their 1301
course. I know that I learn best through observing others, so I plan on taking
this up next semester.
Hi Emma! I also wrote about the significance of discussing/studying what we mean by "critical thinking." So important, yes, for us as aspiring teachers to really explore the various possibilities for curricula and classrooms. I, too, was not aware that there were so many different (at times utterly contradictory) options. Being in this class has definitely pushed me to interrogate my own biases and assumptions (as a writer in addition to a teacher) and to articulate why I value certain things. Like, is reading "great literature" really the best way to teach students? And when they're reading those works, what are they really learning? Grammar? Style? Voice? Historical content? I still believe in teaching literary texts in a composition classroom, but I'm seeing how the emphasis would need to be shifted--from literary analysis and contemplation...to rhetorical engagement. Though sometimes there's quite a bit of overlap. After all, Shakespeare's sonnets all have arguments you can dissect and study (for years and years). Deceptively simple poems by Li-Young Lee or Lucille Clifton also reward close study. But shouldn't students who are trying to write essays also read essays? It's hard to decide what to include on a syllabus or reading list because for every possible inclusion, there are probably a dozen other worthy/appropriate candidates...
ReplyDeleteHi Emma,
ReplyDeleteI like how you discussed the hypermediated syllabus. This is something I do for my important papers -- in Word docs or Acrobat pdfs. It's an important step in addressing the meta -- writing about what you wrote. The recursive nature of this exercise helps to reinforce my own learning and to back-apply new pedagogical methodologies.
Nice ideas about shadowing, especially, too. I found this today, also, and thought you might like to read it, on empathy. http://www.edutopia.org/blog/empathy-classroom-why-should-i-care-lauren-owen?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow&utm_campaign=RSS&utm_content=FaceBook
ReplyDelete